From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-31848-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 14198 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2013 21:20:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 31848
Received: (qmail 29248 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2013 21:20:32 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <131019141958.ZM10010@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:19:58 -0700
In-reply-to: <20131018234351.600adfc6@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
 "Re: zsh syntax check fails on correct if [[ usage (rhbz 966911)" (Oct 18,
 11:43pm)
References: <52613F82.1000009@redhat.com>
	<131018084831.ZM8783@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20131018165614.48f399b7@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<131018122000.ZM9018@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20131018234351.600adfc6@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: zsh syntax check fails on correct if [[ usage (rhbz 966911)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 18, 11:43pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} All sounds like the execsimple() optimisation mayhem --- it's all a
} little bit funny what's considered "simple" and what isn't.
} 
} I've committed the fix for that --- see if any of the funnies you
} spotted persist.

That seems to have done the trick for NO_EXEC.

The only oddity that persists is that "zsh -fvc 'something'" does not
display any verbose output for 'something'.