From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-31932-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 27929 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2013 15:29:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 31932
Received: (qmail 413 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2013 15:29:27 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <131030082930.ZM8009@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:29:30 -0700
In-reply-to: <20131030105933.4c6336e0@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
 "Re: PATCH: add more ulimit extensions from BSDs" (Oct 30, 10:59am)
References: <20131030.86li1bwnj5@bitmessage.ch>
	<20131030105933.4c6336e0@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: add more ulimit extensions from BSDs
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 30, 10:59am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: PATCH: add more ulimit extensions from BSDs
}
} > while sh's ulimit -a describes them as
} > 
} >   kqueues                         (-k)  unlimited
} > 
} > and DragonFly only has
} > 
} >   posixlocks                      (-k)  unlimited
} 
} Thanks for the changes... are we sure that posixlocks and kqueues are
} mutually incompatible, or should we move one to -K via #define's if both
} exist?

It makes me nervous to have two limits on the same option letter even if
they are not mutually incompatible.  Lots of people (including me) have
"portable" RC files.