From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15096 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2013 20:27:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32164 Received: (qmail 22781 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2013 20:27:12 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <131220122701.ZM15525@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:27:00 -0800 In-reply-to: <20131220192435.GE27889@sym.noone.org> Comments: In reply to Axel Beckert "Fwd (potential regression in 5.0.3): Bug#732726: zsh function freeze" (Dec 20, 8:24pm) References: <20131220192435.GE27889@sym.noone.org> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Axel Beckert , zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Fwd (potential regression in 5.0.3): Bug#732726: zsh function freeze MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Dec 20, 8:24pm, Axel Beckert wrote: } } Since 5.0.4 seems close, I thought I'd better forward it soon despite } I haven't looked at it closer yet. You're just a tiny bit too late -- PWS announced zsh-5.0.4 about 25 minutes before your email was sent. :-( } this has been reported[1] against zsh 5.0.3 in Debian today. Looks like } some regression in 5.0.3 on a first glance. Maybe related to the } test-suite freezes which have been reported on a few architectures. I think that's unlikely unless svnwrapper is using zpty. I'm not a user of SVN at this point so I don't have a reference. Best at this point to see if you can still reproduce it with the current zsh source from git.