From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30423-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8118 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2012 21:11:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30423
Received: (qmail 10435 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2012 21:11:20 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at pimlott.net designates 72.249.23.100 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pimlott.net; s=default;
	h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Date:References:In-reply-to:To:From:Subject:Cc:Content-Type; bh=ZGBhVLg0ipsZCAB84Pp4gRHdPG38lSxuoh4LPdba7GM=;
	b=NcezGHpagXiheoMlzg25QBAOVtqFQPrEsTynKDwzyKxwA83ofoxNitt91UDZPmj+LBF6fTig8eVu36LVLvCue2I1wEfaW8An5umV4wmQoph4+8Dd1ZOqo6rJe3hjdVXaMqbxhj0+Cr1fiDDcHxzo+y3x89r+UGJxEIWnFXrTClA=;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: 303623-submitter <303623-submitter@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#303623: Follow-up: CHECK_JOBS doesn't work when only one command was run since last Control-D
From: Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.net>
To: zsh-workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
In-reply-to: <120419074013.ZM7867@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <1334792501-sup-5154@pimlott.net> <120418212700.ZM6913@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120419093645.40ae75fb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <120419074013.ZM7867@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:11:14 -0700
Message-Id: <1334869476-sup-7478@pimlott.net>
User-Agent: Sup/git
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Nice archeology, guys. ;)  I'm grateful to you for checking this out.  I
bet at least a couple other people have experienced this and not known
what hit them.  (Your terminal window is gone, you're in shock: you
probably can't reconstruct how it happened.)

Regarding the idea that "if you've just looked at the jobs it will still
exit", I would argue against that.  It seems like a surprise case to me,
and I'd prefer the extra protection and consistency.  But if that's the
way it's always been meant to work, I can understand it.

Andrew