From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25185 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 17:27:50 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 17:27:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 92051 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 17:27:44 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 17:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 14741 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2005 17:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21623 Received: (qmail 14732 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 17:27:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 91751 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from mailhost1.csr.com (HELO MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com) (81.105.217.43) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 17:27:38 -0000 Received: from exchange03.csr.com (unverified [10.100.137.60]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:25:27 +0100 Received: from csr.com ([10.102.144.127]) by exchange03.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:27:38 +0100 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: make unicode support configurable In-reply-to: <20050815171733.GB29158@blorf.net> References: <20050815171733.GB29158@blorf.net> Comments: In-reply-to Wayne Davison message dated "Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:17:33 -0700." Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:27:37 +0100 Message-ID: <13553.1124126857@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2005 17:27:38.0351 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1FD2FF0:01C5A1BE] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 Wayne Davison wrote: > o Do we like the above name for the --with/--without option? Probably something more general is appropriate (indeed, it would be for the name ZLE_UNICODE_SUPPORT if the definition doesn't depend on ISO 10646). --enable-multibyte-zle is about the best I can think of. > o Is including locale.h (if it exists) the right include file for > the new configure test for __STDC_ISO_10646__? (It works on my > Linux system.) No idea about this. > o Do we need the old unicode "subset" logic that I removed from > system.h? It's possible we might: it controls whether printf understands Unicode. That depends on rather less support being present than for zle. It's quite useful to be able to print Unicode characters even without the support in zle. Eventually, we might decide that there's a high enough level of support for zle in any system where we can print Unicode characters, but we haven't got there yet. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. **********************************************************************