From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6652 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1998 14:15:52 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Nov 1998 14:15:52 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA21905; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:13:39 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:13:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <13891.837.482119.82749@catbus.alphatech.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 09:10:13 -0500 (EST) From: greg@alphatech.com (Greg Klanderman) To: "Bart Schaefer" Cc: greg@alphatech.com, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh list) Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5 - cumulative reverse-kills (Re: [patch] deltochar) In-Reply-To: <981105231353.ZM32715@candle.brasslantern.com> References: <13889.57739.993748.165972@catbus.alphatech.com> <981105231353.ZM32715@candle.brasslantern.com> Reply-To: greg@alphatech.com X-Mailer: VM 6.62 under 21.0 "Pyrenean-pre4" XEmacs Lucid Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"5D6Nf2.0.9M5.JGmGs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4582 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >>>>> "Bart" == Bart Schaefer writes: Bart> Bart> On Nov 5, 12:34pm, Greg Klanderman wrote: Bart> } Subject: [patch] deltochar Bart> } Bart> } Reverse kills were not handled correctly. Also, kill the text so it Bart> } can be yanked, like emacs does. Bart> Bart> I'm being sort of nitpicky here, but I think the following is a better Bart> patch. It makes the reverse kill case parallel the forward kill case Bart> more closely. Looks better to me, thanks. greg