From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id CAA03394 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 02:57:10 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA07275; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 12:51:25 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 12:51:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Zefram Message-Id: <13930.199607011556@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Re: pre1 on hpux bug To: bas@astro.uva.nl (Bas V. de Bakker) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 16:56:35 +0100 (BST) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <199607011328.JAA05138@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu> from "Bas V. de Bakker" at Jul 1, 96 03:27:48 pm X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk X-Stardate: [-31]7743.32 X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"6dkfl2.0.bn1.D80sn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1495 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >- # ifdef __hpux >- /* HPUX does have the BSD rlimits in the kernel. Officially they are * >- * unsupported but quite a few of them like RLIMIT_CORE seem to work. * >- * All the following are in the but made visible * >- * only for the kernel. */ >Note that all these definitions are in , but with >RLIMIT_AS added and RLIM_NLIMITS defined to 8. Maybe that #ifdef should merely be changed to "#if defined(__hpux) && !defined(RLIM_NLIMITS)". -zefram