From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-32313-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 9390 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2014 17:42:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 32313
Received: (qmail 10749 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2014 17:41:47 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <140128094147.ZM21307@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:41:47 -0800
In-reply-to: <20140128164708.0c7facb6@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
 "Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines" (Jan 28,  4:47pm)
References:
 <CANWLQWsV5i+=3NptAxir6UYCoipFa2Pk+g6D1DDnMnJMVCbDgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130923213014.15f97f9e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<3511.1390605547@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<140125111530.ZM21792@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20140127124301.4144f2d9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<20140127161124.2aa16b37@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<20140128145847.7204df4e@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<140128082834.ZM21167@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20140128164708.0c7facb6@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jan 28,  4:47pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} > Sorry, I missed this when looking at your previous message.  I agree
} > that "a" is more correct than "i" here.  In fact "A" might even be a
} > reasonable choice.
} 
} Except, of course, if someone has redefined "a" / "A" in vicmd to the
} widget delete-all-my-files-and-self-detonate.

We could reverse-lookup the bindking for vi-add-next / vi-add-eol and
insert whatever we find ...