From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7841 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2014 16:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32328 Received: (qmail 1742 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2014 16:03:38 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <140130080330.ZM23640@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:03:30 -0800 In-reply-to: <20140130153823.28a7818c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines" (Jan 30, 3:38pm) References: <20130923213014.15f97f9e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <3511.1390605547@thecus.kiddle.eu> <140125111530.ZM21792@torch.brasslantern.com> <20140127124301.4144f2d9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20140127161124.2aa16b37@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <2700.1390950035@thecus.kiddle.eu> <20140130153823.28a7818c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 30, 3:38pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } I think this is probably OK generally since it seems to reflect fairly } intuitively what counts as a change. With the ability to undo } repeatedly I certainly don't think this needs any more configuration. } } It looks very much along the right lines, but I'll let the others } comment. I don't use vi mode much, so I won't comment on that beyond saying that this sounds like the approach I was advocating earlier. As for emacs mode, I have no objection to changing the undo behavior in the way described.