From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22747 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2014 19:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32336 Received: (qmail 25063 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2014 19:27:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <140201112741.ZM26063@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:27:41 -0800 In-reply-to: <19751.1391207572@thecus.kiddle.eu> Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle "Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines" (Jan 31, 11:32pm) References: <20130923213014.15f97f9e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <3511.1390605547@thecus.kiddle.eu> <140125111530.ZM21792@torch.brasslantern.com> <20140127124301.4144f2d9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20140127161124.2aa16b37@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <2700.1390950035@thecus.kiddle.eu> <19068.1391204240@thecus.kiddle.eu> <19751.1391207572@thecus.kiddle.eu> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 31, 11:32pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote: } Subject: Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines } } I wrote: } > How about we instead add a split-undo zle } > widget? It is then easy for someone to add that before completion or } > other widgets like backward-delete-word. } } I've attached a patch for this split-undo widget to demonstrate. This all seems fine to me.