From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28793 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2014 19:04:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32739 Received: (qmail 5974 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2014 19:04:44 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <140607120439.ZM24985@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:04:39 -0700 In-reply-to: <1402161535-20756-1-git-send-email-nikolas@garofil.be> Comments: In reply to Nikolas Garofil "[PATCH 1/6] fix implicit typecast for strict compilers" (Jun 7, 7:18pm) References: <1402161535-20756-1-git-send-email-nikolas@garofil.be> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] fix implicit typecast for strict compilers MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 7, 7:18pm, Nikolas Garofil wrote: } } diff --git a/Src/compat.c b/Src/compat.c } index cc4e876..81a95d5 100644 } --- a/Src/compat.c } +++ b/Src/compat.c } @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ strstr(const char *s, const char *t) } char *p1, *p2; } } for (; *s; s++) { } - for (p1 = s, p2 = t; *p2; p1++, p2++) } + for (p1 = (char*)s, p2 = (char*)t; *p2; p1++, p2++) } if (*p1 != *p2) } break; } if (!*p2) } -- Wouldn't the right thing here be to declare const char *p1, *p2; instead of casting? -- Barton E. Schaefer