From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-32951-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 18345 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2014 17:48:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 32951
Received: (qmail 1509 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2014 17:48:07 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <140804104751.ZM536@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:47:51 -0700
In-reply-to: <14861.1406824252@thecus.kiddle.eu>
Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
 "Re: using tag-order with _pids" (Jul 31,  6:30pm)
References: <18723.1406025098@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<140722205805.ZM23154@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<14861.1406824252@thecus.kiddle.eu>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: using tag-order with _pids
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Sorry for slow response, I was out of town for a few days.

On Jul 31,  6:30pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
}
} For now, I can use a hack with zstyle -e. I think the _pids change is
} fairly harmless unless anyone objects?

I think both the _pids and _kill patches are fine.