From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33334-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 353 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2014 16:16:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33334
Received: (qmail 25969 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2014 16:16:51 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <141002091656.ZM12380@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:16:56 -0700
In-reply-to: <20141002165807.0dc13b68@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
 "Re: zsh 5.0.7" (Oct  2,  4:58pm)
References: <20141001203847.2a7c000d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<20141002165807.0dc13b68@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>,
 "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.7
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 2,  4:58pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} Source distribution documentation.  Does this sound right?

I'd leave out the word "major" -- we don't know of any exploits, do we?

Otherwise fine.