From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6512 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2014 14:50:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33344 Received: (qmail 23055 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2014 14:50:34 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <141003075022.ZM14943@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:50:22 -0700 In-reply-to: <20141003132702.044f9475@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: More incmdpos stuff Re: Crash Re: Trial for 5.0.7" (Oct 3, 1:27pm) References: <20141003132702.044f9475@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh workers Subject: More crash Re: More incmdpos stuff Re: Crash Re: Trial for 5.0.7 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 3, 1:27pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: More incmdpos stuff Re: Crash Re: Trial for 5.0.7 } } On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:47:25 +0200 } Mikael Magnusson wrote: } > % () ( echo hi; echo $@ ) ls } > hi } > ls --color=auto -T 0 -A -v --quoting-style=shell } } I think the right answer is along the lines of "WHY THE **@*@*@ WOULD } ANYBODY USE SYNTAX LIKE THAT SHELL SYNTAX IS UNREADABLE ENOUGH AS IT IS } WITHOUT (FROTH, GIBBER, ...)", but instead here's a minimal change until } I get around to investigating why I thought I needed to leave incmdpos } = 1 for non-anymous functions. Well, here's a clue: With the patch from 33343 applied, it now makes no difference whether I do or do not back out the parse.c hunks from 32552. Either way, 'print foo | () cat' crashes.