From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17837 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2014 00:11:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33789 Received: (qmail 4311 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2014 00:11:33 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F/vgrRlI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=FT8er97JFeGWzr5TCOCO5w==:117 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8 a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10 a=5y4faFyK3SkA:10 a=3x8ivv9tXDW4pG-SU_AA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=D3NP4RX8gt8A:10 a=IQgcrKi5RvgA:10 a=lHtVh1lsXdIA:10 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <141123161154.ZM15898@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:11:54 -0800 In-reply-to: <21240C97-F8F1-45F7-8F15-4454D4066276@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Comments: In reply to "Jun T." "Re: Confirming X02zlevi test failures" (Nov 23, 4:44pm) References: <141119085006.ZM18951@torch.brasslantern.com> <11014.1416438322@quattro> <141119222019.ZM2717@torch.brasslantern.com> <5A1A98B7-42E0-4EE1-9468-32E2D6434246@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <141120091803.ZM3693@torch.brasslantern.com> <2D312191-3B6F-49BE-9289-95DDA6DAC1F4@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <141122193250.ZM15938@torch.brasslantern.com> <21240C97-F8F1-45F7-8F15-4454D4066276@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: "Jun T." , zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Confirming X02zlevi test failures MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Nov 23, 4:44pm, Jun T. wrote: } } Sorry, my post was not clear enough. } I need BOTH zpty_flush and '-t 0.02' to get 1000/1000 success. } With zpty_flush only, I got 998/1000 success on Mac (1000/1000 on FreeBSD). With the patch from 33769 applied, I get about 30% failure rate of X02 (running just that test repeatedly), e.g., repeat 100 make check TESTNUM=X02