zsh-workers
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
To: pseyfert <pseyfert.mathphys@gmail.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: git remote set-url completion
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14151.1527637608@thecus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521204513.GA26538@robusta>

On 21 May, pseyfert wrote:
>
> I was not happy with the completion of
> git remote set-url <some remote> TAB
>
> in my usage this should yield the same completions as `git clone TAB`
> (a url like https://gitlab.my_project.tld or git@github.com or some path to a local repository)

git clone doesn't seem to complete http: style URLs either.

> So I put the below patch together which uses __git_repositories (and _urls) instead of _urls.

Thanks for this. I've got a few comments.

> I also saw there was a todo left in _git for doing
> git remote set-url <some remote> <new url> <old url>
> which used to just use _urls for the completion of old url,
> here I get the output of `git remote get-url <some remote> --all`

Except the --all is missing.

> +          # TODO: Old URL does not get completed if --push, --add, or --delete are present

With --push, the old URL is, I believe, still valid. And with --delete, it
is the new one that should be excluded.

The (3) exclusion should work. Perhaps add the numbers into the next arg
specifications to make it clearer given that they're being referenced.

> +          # TODO: assumes $line[1] is always the remote name

That seems correct to me and not an assumption.

> +          _message "the line is: $line"

That looks like leftover debug.

> +(( $+functions[__git_repositories_or_url] )) ||
> +__git_repositories_or_url () {
> +  _alternative \
> +    'repositories::__git_repositories' \
> +    'url::_urls'

The tag should be 'urls' rather than 'url'.

> +}
> +
> +(( $+functions[__git_current_remote_url] )) ||
> +__git_current_remote_url () {
> +    # TODO: is ${(@)*[1,4]} a proper replacement for $* and passing extra arguments?

NO.

Various styles can affect what _description adds. matcher-list for
example. Don't rely on that.

I'd be inclined to throw away the inherited arguments. A space in the
_arguments spec prevents them from being added:

  '3:old url: __git_current_remote_url $line[1]'

Or make the helper function not be a completion function so that you
have something like:
  
  '3:old url:compadd - $(__git_current_remote_url $line[1])'

> +    # TODO: add --push to the `git remote get-url` command in case `git remote set-url --push origin <new url> <TAB>` is completed

Adding ${(k)opt_args[--push]} should get you that. It also needs --all
adding in case there are more than one.

Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-29 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-21 20:45 pseyfert
2018-05-29 23:46 ` Oliver Kiddle [this message]
2018-08-31 20:54 ` Oliver Kiddle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14151.1527637608@thecus \
    --to=okiddle@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=pseyfert.mathphys@gmail.com \
    --cc=zsh-workers@zsh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).