From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16687 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 09:39:00 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 09:39:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21016 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2002 09:38:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 17796 Received: (qmail 21004 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 09:38:52 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: PATCH: tied parameters bug In-reply-to: "Oliver Kiddle"'s message of "Wed, 09 Oct 2002 09:47:07 BST." Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:38:23 +0100 Message-ID: <14828.1034156303@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson Oliver Kiddle wrote: > Is the ename field of the param struct really used for anything other > than tied parameters? If not, the comment next to it in zsh.h is > confusing. It may be historical; possibly at one stage it only pointed one way, from a path-array to a PATH-array, but now it points both ways in both types of tied parameters, internal and user-defined. I don't think it's used for anything else. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. **********************************************************************