From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7748 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2017 08:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40621 Received: (qmail 8403 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2017 08:19:25 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.221):SA:0(-0.4/5.0):. Processed in 1.586296 secs); 23 Feb 2017 08:19:25 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: psprint2@fastmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at spf.messagingengine.com designates 66.111.4.221 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=RNeYGec301n9xaxqOcIfcABwUn M=; b=JmKGXBcot/Riljldx29kQO3EOHMSiWLt8sMnTP4XXAZZRJzhlSltzOeK4A E2xUqI/BOJe5Kw+h0T8xZBqxg6Z6A0XsWP3t75DQDt8bDybaN+K/6TL8NMrV5Rvq qAvyU2NzeEwpN/DByVaxYCYXHyQ4PvMXkhUhLj1kVy3rciyiY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=RN eYGec301n9xaxqOcIfcABwUnM=; b=jSw1DCyTbZMAAFdsaxFz3iFav4uB+Hql4k xDd6q8FNDsZaetOIIM5439F1zi9ZWknWireKR39FriJUeyD210g+xmByaHksPktV 6oIBCq7eDMx9qeD75Rg+YF9tVtUFlZEQ3HIMQPuQ3fQ4ftUjjsB8dZmwKko07dUb NsRSxzAck= X-ME-Sender: Message-Id: <1487837958.4071562.890190056.5522DC79@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Sebastian Gniazdowski To: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-715c2c0c References: <170221092506.ZM14329@torch.brasslantern.com> <1487706736.1879125.888350120.03C172EE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <170221204132.ZM15938@torch.brasslantern.com> <1487754648.2910142.888918792.4BD9197F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <170222074415.ZM18336@torch.brasslantern.com> Subject: Re: Gdbm module In-Reply-To: <170222074415.ZM18336@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:19:18 -0800 On Wed, Feb 22, 2017, at 07:44 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > We are somewhat limited by lacking > a mechanism for nested hashrefs, but consider the way "typeset -T" can > specify the format of array <-> scalar joining. I plan to write a module that will just blindly put PM_HASH instead of PM_HASHELEM into PM_HASH. See what will happen. The code handling value retrieval is sophisticated, maybe even blind to structure, just follows its PM_HASH etc. detection, I'm counting on that. BTW. Retrieving from PM_SCALAR means double getter call. Saw that when working on db_gdbm/zgdbm. I'm sure there's no error on my side, I've even rolled out complete debugger walk. This could be an optimization, to change/fix that. -- Sebastian Gniazdowski psprint2@fastmail.com