From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5943 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 18:23:06 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 18:23:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 16984 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 18:22:59 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 18:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 21052 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2005 18:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21628 Received: (qmail 21043 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 18:22:57 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 18:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 16740 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 18:22:57 -0000 Received: from mailhost1.csr.com (HELO MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com) (81.105.217.43) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 18:22:51 -0000 Received: from exchange03.csr.com (unverified [10.100.137.60]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:20:39 +0100 Received: from csr.com ([10.102.144.127]) by exchange03.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:22:50 +0100 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix recursive ZLE from completion call In-reply-to: <200508152207.27813.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> References: <200508152207.27813.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> Comments: In-reply-to Andrey Borzenkov message dated "Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:07:27 +0400." Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:22:49 +0100 Message-ID: <14912.1124130169@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2005 18:22:50.0946 (UTC) FILETIME=[58731220:01C5A1C6] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > That is becoming ridiculous. Any chance to have single entry point > (wrapper?) for ZLE and completion functions? If anybody understood the completion code well enough to do that, the code would have been completely rewritten by now. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. **********************************************************************