From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34507-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 28150 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2015 16:14:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34507
Received: (qmail 24957 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2015 16:14:03 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=QM3fnbPO c=1 sm=1 tr=0	a=FT8er97JFeGWzr5TCOCO5w==:117
 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8	a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10
 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10	a=ocaq9udsygDXhSy_dykA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=gL07tUiEwjoA:10
	a=JZ-1ZXOZwLAA:10
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <150211081345.ZM17542@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:13:45 -0800
In-reply-to: <20150211101130.2ac4d9b5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
 "Re: Zsh scripts leave defunct processes when running under docker exec" (Feb
 11, 10:11am)
References:
 <CACUDQOE1y34_b_OF8g4kf7JJisyBc0T5Chr_E8xkZiyO_kTRGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH+w=7YBD6ocsd6+PL-AgpkDt4-O2AHPQa06U2=b7s2LfeORQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150211101130.2ac4d9b5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Zsh scripts leave defunct processes when running under docker exec
Cc: Soares Chen <soares.chen@gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Feb 11, 10:11am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
}
} If that *is* it, is it just a case of special-casing PID 1 not to do
} "fake" execs?  That's not so hard and shouldn't be problematic in other
} cases.

That would help, but I don't think that's everything, because zsh would
still not reap background grandchildren of children which exited first.

In fact I don't even know how it *could* do that; we've reached the limit
of my current knowledge of docker / PID namespaces.