From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34517-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 24622 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2015 16:44:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34517
Received: (qmail 3165 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2015 16:43:55 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=I4zSn2kl c=1 sm=1 tr=0	a=FT8er97JFeGWzr5TCOCO5w==:117
 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8	a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10
 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10	a=qGfdgLGw11Lo4BlvV-4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <150212084323.ZM20337@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:43:23 -0800
In-reply-to: <20150212092536.74db3b50@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
 "Re: completion problem with '291' ok with '274'." (Feb 12,  9:25am)
References: <54DA87F5.5090303@eastlink.ca>
	<150210183520.ZM16470@torch.brasslantern.com>	<54DACEF7.90605@eastlink.ca>
	<150210202035.ZM16595@torch.brasslantern.com>	<54DAF251.4040702@eastlink.ca>
	<150211082827.ZM17558@torch.brasslantern.com>	<54DB93F2.6090202@eastlink.ca>
	<CAH+w=7ZTM3njL=cO4AbdVU29KnjPLGqZ1euqnQMzRKFCvxCiSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DBE5BF.3020609@eastlink.ca>
	<CAH+w=7Yx5FX4ZOB=EKbNULy86+Q+czDM-YA90-j3H=X4v2eS0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DC0675.4040808@eastlink.ca>
	<CAH+w=7YisQBt_UJLjv4pmohvE0BL9Wr0TFye9Kio=b4NxH5Niw@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DC34EF.4010204@eastlink.ca>	<150211213054.ZM19450@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20150212092536.74db3b50@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: completion problem with '291' ok with '274'.
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Feb 12,  9:25am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: completion problem with '291' ok with '274'.
}
} On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:30:54 -0800
} Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
} > So basically we have to back out all of 34485 and start that over.
} 
} Yes, it's job control stuff that the test suite doesn't cover.

So I should go ahead and commit that back-out?

} Removing the tests in front of the "*cmplx = 1" must be safe in the
} sense that if it shows up problems for annonymous functions then they're
} already present in the standard execution path and hence need fixing.

I thought we determined before that there's some sort of interaction
between the wordcode generation and the setting of *cmplx such that
one can't just change the way that value is computed in par_simple()
et al.  without making a corresponding change upstream?

I'm probably mis-remembering.