From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28153 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2015 17:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34566 Received: (qmail 16143 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2015 17:13:52 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Kc1larcG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=FT8er97JFeGWzr5TCOCO5w==:117 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8 a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10 a=XyS2DspHukFRohOEz6EA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <150217091320.ZM19971@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:13:20 -0800 In-reply-to: <20150217125716.2f485dcf@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: PATCH: Crash bug on garbage input (previously reported to Debian)" (Feb 17, 12:57pm) References: <150214102534.ZM4368@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150214214209.6d2f5e7e@ntlworld.com> <150215112622.ZM11584@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150216125749.7a26822c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150216170413.054623af@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <150216113923.ZM5698@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150217125716.2f485dcf@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Crash bug on garbage input (previously reported to Debian) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 17, 12:57pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: Crash bug on garbage input (previously reported to De } } On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:39:23 -0800 } Bart Schaefer wrote: } > torch% print $((case foo in } > mathsubst> } > } > If you send-break (ctrl+c) at this point, the input is entirely discarded } > and can't be recalled with up-line-or-history. } } I'm not getting this now. If I abort here, I can recall the line above, } though anything I type on that second line gets discarded (which I think } is standard). Yep, confirmed. Apparently that last patch for the memory leak also took care of this, though I don't immediately see why.