From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5041 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2015 04:00:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34710 Received: (qmail 28555 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 04:00:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=JRHjkmOV62wrAy9ZQ3ZZXbmDqgBBjkv25rMowEdTmRc=; b=LrE+EKB0TRBZ1KM1h0TVjOktjFNoK51tiQMuCrXLVPIUsi2zrAQRsndP/s8o4QQecQ wvPRvgZCPeSUpLqZRXvqkZ00QUz7C7hP9MNVUQTQrmQKlNKzuDJ+XauYFGJfAoElZBHk tdDZjoLrLfnOT4v8WR0PJRkA3fWOXKhb7QHdawwJYdBDRIKBK7bGxR6JJWLX7O2J2D6P yfNmfyixu0zPm6uID5WeBGXDj76MfeFoL/cbVZPgmfj1SCvovgZKnY+jBAe1AAHljHBx PJZeRN8UlSYQ+PRm9qhvG1SmzHSEh0a0N65pfLAj+5QF7FaNeVBm+nYiz/BjbN3q7PpH z7mg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQieYczLDKiHjUb98gSU5AyF+ueGkdc1OViA/YG4jQID0WKCOq/pQ+lxXivvL0BYEB7N7P X-Received: by 10.182.65.97 with SMTP id w1mr37024358obs.73.1426219249097; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 21:00:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150312210046.ZM16358@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 21:00:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150312195814.52aa6bed@ntlworld.com> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Bug: ZSH crashes upon receiving SIGINT" (Mar 12, 7:58pm) References: <91460363.4306421.1426117627753.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <20150312195814.52aa6bed@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: John , Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: Bug: ZSH crashes upon receiving SIGINT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 12, 7:58pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: Bug: ZSH crashes upon receiving SIGINT } } Bart may well have more idea what might be going wrong and have more } idea what to instrument, however. No, your instrumentation there looks pretty comprehensive to me.