From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34838-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 11133 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2015 16:48:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34838
Received: (qmail 10698 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2015 16:48:08 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=XyFIIveVBJO55ljgE8yIC6Geru0ZThSfdS8f6FLqA4U=;
        b=k8rV21vwhYOawtw+H2noXRzzZPPCqQ8wFn4AHXdvzZCniOw+BGJ5PNxUETbtoWPJRK
         6y/c+WtmHLlxjXRrrCC1FFdgpsOh9cZblIw+WnAh6PrQUWilJ6aDIHn8wHEvifzk6rn4
         f4OiJ7q7ziG++4jF99aP70r/NoY3vBZjXoL5F7jaaBwZ+uADMQyGe6gD18zXLGUy/oaa
         /Tt/9W/3S+wwDkPMdeRb+ua2CppbwNlU5zY1kfDuIw66LFheJVRx3xiZmhCNcLN4ftOE
         kxBWqaoGIWc0S8Rj4T0LNMRw4OeppzV6jAW7zOUhkC70S8jB2ub1IZ0zPJDmHfhyWkWq
         vAaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlqdzKaedWwsP6X3f9HPU9GN/+ioRywmvvm009GBkZnifYebrDFpNgYt2lrPxM/ZtGAs1YQ
X-Received: by 10.60.124.83 with SMTP id mg19mr48203813oeb.42.1427993286846;
        Thu, 02 Apr 2015 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <150402094803.ZM12463@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:48:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <8D0CBF9F-48C2-407C-AAAB-C2F0A03D3299@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Comments: In reply to "Jun T." <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
        "Re: [PATCH] Better prompt width calculations (Re: Possible bug to RPROMPT)" (Apr  3, 12:46am)
References: <201408041950.s74Jo1PS001579@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> 
	<140804135036.ZM1983@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<140805005445.ZM27314@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<140806005719.ZM28961@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<140807013638.ZM10806@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<8D0CBF9F-48C2-407C-AAAB-C2F0A03D3299@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better prompt width calculations (Re: Possible bug to RPROMPT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Apr 3, 12:46am, Jun T. wrote:
}
} > -in the string to be truncated.
} > +in the string to be truncated.  Note that `tt(%-0<<)' is a distinct
} > +
} 
} The statement
}   ".... is a distinct"
} seems to be "truncated". Maybe something like the following?
}   "... is not equivalent to `tt(%<<)' but specifies that the prompt is
}   truncated at the right margin."

Yes, that must have been where I was going with that.  Feel free to make
the edit.  Thanks.