From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35195-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 22703 invoked by alias); 19 May 2015 00:30:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35195
Received: (qmail 6079 invoked from network); 19 May 2015 00:30:42 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=yXq8C+8vEqaOQe3HgAu3uBlp6ocbIQkJWZFhc492AzQ=;
        b=Go3BVPXRsFl6/f0mISnPti/YnKnZT0azCFZlnCkqcofbO6kbhgyHxOOSg3DTIpjm7w
         JL+atx8q5h4rx29e/zEs6bDUch+j28gnkV86jStAhQGXlYeyU+3dK4S6SIpDdLgN0eGm
         E20LUhZ75zsiKGuweFWp3y/R3JilDXMl58EGfAMDUz70a4L0OPNLX74F5QWqIghFkGE+
         ZzluUT/bbCuJA6lnonSun+6RVhmIeAvJ84tL97gO9hkC+f+RP3q8+/L8yw9WsXmrLbO/
         t3KhYyy4ycVMJzNO5coxCgYSs0V1gqJ5Ovp2ng8og11BT16DnFfItGkYqUFvGY70ppR5
         Le4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8gvnYbtJFnehsRVh6Jz0PV7kJBqopoYBHZHyuFEvSRozw8PhmRTyc9v+lkjoVgy6ukJ7S
X-Received: by 10.182.85.135 with SMTP id h7mr1271231obz.65.1431995437635;
        Mon, 18 May 2015 17:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <150518173034.ZM2314@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:30:34 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20150518124039.0160a3bb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
        "Re: vim completion problem after workers/35168" (May 18, 12:40pm)
References: <CAJ1KOAh9_WHM9WS_NKXFy9Dhqrsupi+xT36euHLq9iaWaZ_oig@mail.gmail.com> 
	<20150518115301.0c80918d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> 
	<CAJ1KOAhWcNN-F7jXgo0vCc+ioR2d09_f1Np9EWf0TS+rZ-fkkw@mail.gmail.com> 
	<20150518124039.0160a3bb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: vim completion problem after workers/35168
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On May 18, 12:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: vim completion problem after workers/35168
}
} On Mon, 18 May 2015 14:22:20 +0300
} Ismail Donmez <ismail@donmez.ws> wrote:
} > _vim:7: parse error near `)'
} 
} Yet another annoyance: in the old hack, you got away with having a
} pattern beginning with "(" (and containing balanced parentheses)
} followed by an unbalanced ")".  Now you don't.

Hrm.  Zsh patterns include "(this|that)", and "case" syntax includes
"pattern)" without an open paren, so ...?

The "old hack" is one of those "well, it really should have been done
differently in the first place, but it wasn't, so now what?" issues
that bug me because *somebody* is going to get bitten in the way _vim
just was.