From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21161 invoked by alias); 20 May 2015 17:36:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35241 Received: (qmail 23122 invoked from network); 20 May 2015 17:36:15 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=eFeoUHmOIja/CoCsxsYMbOMmY0a6GtyMJxaBDH/R3d4=; b=DXuxL477du83citolFQNXfedgas7pdAfVqAAzuxVdlzhQ+r7YoY78xA3qUuSI5rlUI cQjdTuC3fikUV3FdQZsU+IwFkLTnBoCdtuD3lJr+j3GGnWGM2I296v9IbYpo8nNA9Apb c+GgHwN+hQYCzW5JmljiGMpOfwuPCictJTum3z9Ubk7YJOwdk8vCkouGyapW4nWgaiD1 /9rgq2KrUt2WurEQaviOdVkU9brDP4VC07Y0mMcmpSQLS0FhvxfMmIgQCt8YcCwtH1Hs X+gv4l1FWBZvzbfq2c6LoUC3d9oT+tpE6vq/XnGNnZkF3viAQ+0lTq0vYtAo17KnyCqO ScRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmi1qxTYYvlf29HM9jwz21eLGbAz1VSAqP+V8n5hDg4llBLOjrQ789k1zUMfvZ869PcDeBM X-Received: by 10.182.120.170 with SMTP id ld10mr30048237obb.35.1432143370695; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:36:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150520103608.ZM26775@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:36:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to "Jun T." "Re: texi2html vs texi2any" (May 21, 2:19am) References: X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: texi2html vs texi2any MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sorry, but I don't think we ever saw the beginning of the thread to which you were replying?