From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26146 invoked by alias); 28 May 2015 22:19:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35320 Received: (qmail 24726 invoked from network); 28 May 2015 22:19:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=2+P1gbQdZLxbbk9yCP84MSpNmS8wRL7ic4mhM0J7vDw=; b=djCntEvqcCRnKS5xOobZLxgAjWA9fAfwFzQNbukD1e0Gh5+uvZP+sYrWPAj2+0hFzZ lbzwRCFbkknAAu2dZMfqSlvWFeMHg6niobxqGM1Tt/XpD745+cjy9Y1qisEEymizx/K1 XvgQwO9gqOxm5gltCyE/XkunUTl+exHHADyayGM1NQa4/KIAVpGlL0tVs/lmLiU+AUSd Q2iM+jazOYXh6nRH+jDw7kwGCTqmmiDT26y0wDQXhq/4A9AS1EirJnP1uv4DH3790hcN DZTcVqU8Cnl/R8s0cguuIzJBrxy1RMsqeCTn4V7olm3gHatF6nGE5iM1MyFe08UNjPCa 1MRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnOrJjfH3nOva+TVDGaCMwW0n+MIcZYozEstNesee4oIDvUnUZHHjdpUQNmofM0AGqF/hUm X-Received: by 10.202.196.211 with SMTP id u202mr4228526oif.10.1432851538093; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:18:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150528151844.ZM11659@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:18:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <13334.1432764608@thecus.kiddle.eu> Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle "Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache" (May 28, 12:10am) References: <54D78CA8.7010802@thequod.de> <150208122744.ZM5447@torch.brasslantern.com> <13334.1432764608@thecus.kiddle.eu> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: "Zsh Hackers' List" Subject: Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So ... this applies on top of ae7dcab5ed1882b6115c9fe3ab7894a8b6a7e9eb but not with 899613f5351642c8257401054fef5f25725af172. Are we sticking with the reverted version for release, or applying 35310 atop 34476?