From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15697 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2015 19:26:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35945 Received: (qmail 21666 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2015 19:26:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=LfMr+qAoJNfTb0M6eb0J2FMty7/FlKq5u6c0KRy4JZg=; b=V8zTzN2iZZgb/j52tKWFluHGEEqaemA5TdQYq4OyX6u8h4VWp5cJ3d6iWfw0yImSwN i9d06i4R92XEmI5Q3DQgva3XWAWfAr4lmw68zoRJkJy17Vrc5pwMmlhNaJYLonORAhiR FQRK/Y33ch3jAVfQ1TaHvo17i1Rw/TT5fijbeEYjT/fHkap3MMn++Drs3dluNAvFt8qV PWLwHi5guCSAY/+evU6K2udz76ASlA9UWpsVWr1xa++sl6C5iXaFQR+6JqvAkJuCnsTa KHN10EXCKW65TRLJIxxc1yH9NUQKr1feP56iFZ4mbDgVCAt4l+xSlOfaWpoJ7Iu+btdz kOHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnTCRyeMNh2u3+uDqIUTYGih6/h6swuZB94MlY2IwYLzy9cxD3cclO174JOEfoPRn2V5n0S X-Received: by 10.60.16.228 with SMTP id j4mr37828564oed.59.1438111571572; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:26:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150728122607.ZM8134@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:26:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <22F30644-D300-4DA7-9E18-CDA30F0AA8CA@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Comments: In reply to "Jun T." "_make-expandVars() broken? (was Re: Makefile completion with wildcard targets)" (Jul 28, 10:20pm) References: <22F30644-D300-4DA7-9E18-CDA30F0AA8CA@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" Subject: Re: _make-expandVars() broken? (was Re: Makefile completion with wildcard targets) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jul 28, 10:20pm, Jun T. wrote: } } I think this function must be fixed irrespective of what pattern } to use at line 87, and add -Q to compadd or not. I agree. I see you've replaced recursive calls with a loop, that's probably a good thing.