From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18400 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2015 00:20:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36018 Received: (qmail 18552 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2015 00:20:24 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=83f1MwbHcVINBV03lV3OPWTUizdtLL0ywjNjwLCz53U=; b=h2K89RI+nhxftkIy4r1dNxqQbDm0uDy8WqaDDsER6E9DC9gXwhDBYtY4g+X48oHGji yIyb6mvqxgDLPgO5VX0OtF5DsYhMuSt6//k0IdHfjjasW0jbfcEgV32uOQkCYFugUyNC f1iRu+E1lgotzjOJOXu4OXmPkc0TeTjQogOgY/1yZPYIySkecWUuLfBAXqf5nKau2ALS VrC1vEQmdPxydR79ODz+DyQbJMATiD667SfGw2AoyJMIoRy7o8rbcr7X2Ho1ap29jLia zC84qyjnE5IJxFvycZAMrzKaNnQF2nAIlvak5j9o8hOydIFSfHojte/xVQ0m6T42QneO dnvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlr1Nt2R/6bwM5DBTRcPyh+Kj3kgE5AiIoAhSwruCgsY674BTiHHCYlMp1he+ikmEY5mMhW X-Received: by 10.60.54.1 with SMTP id f1mr13961019oep.68.1439079622486; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:20:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150808172019.ZM14068@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:20:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Mikael Magnusson "Re: 5.0.9 eventually...?" (Aug 8, 10:50pm) References: <20150808200521.4e3c85d1@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: 5.0.9 eventually...? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 8, 10:50pm, Mikael Magnusson wrote: } } All the (known) $(( ))-related problems were fixed, right? I believe so, and I think I squashed the "for (( ... ))" one.