From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21236 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2015 00:23:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36019 Received: (qmail 10411 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2015 00:23:22 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=jiEyyL0fcNc7TJCgKupN5gyLFg6W6zWcevVXqjzU2iU=; b=ZsOCfsJ8eiHlfKiadYAqZylvgnIYzGXI25EWo8ViYUg1JZGXVk+iEzdJkLWH/IfLFx jFTlvARPVd5iCyJcToNUwZ4UMtdQ18HdjO/0XZ2pnU8Y6IIeuTHjgGK1ilHNN4lOvJPf zAApReFMFUi8fdIE4FWK/XxXuyCDDfiOOfnsibEQRylv4kGTDAsuXWk4S675/+tA7mD9 Gcze6GK1Lyx19DYGw7+t1AvBH8oevn1cf3upNx4HMyj4V/ynRzc85ErnOVUcSsEysd4L zthI1k1bTo+2vnkwfYFnXYys2P6FcZgmwG4EHw15Z4lCARKfgZerN5tzV/YPXbXRSd3R 3KSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltoVSK3DPeN3ymH6Rtrdb7W9gSRS2xXhmrBdaGDUE9ap85xZSzcO0n5EWlnuqlQHsbBFWJ X-Received: by 10.60.42.230 with SMTP id r6mr14190089oel.9.1439079801318; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150808172317.ZM14085@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:23:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <28695.1439068936@thecus.kiddle.eu> Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle "Re: 5.0.9 eventually...?" (Aug 8, 11:22pm) References: <20150808200521.4e3c85d1@ntlworld.com> <28695.1439068936@thecus.kiddle.eu> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: 5.0.9 eventually...? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 8, 11:22pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote: } } Has anything been done about the bug reported in 35852? I was guessing } that was related to typeset changes. No, nothing has been done about that. It is indeed new in 5.0.8, so the typeset changes are a likely place to look.