From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25117 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2015 00:25:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36020 Received: (qmail 20329 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2015 00:25:03 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=neLt02lpAX9cQjMxZj7b1pLpL2gkO5dL/+1zUhPzz/4=; b=a0FCex+b7aJMR+RDFqvsNrmThEKti7kUKiSVQmQFFcps5VCZP0ySLfVrIBbp/pywTz FANoQpuu/wrZXgcmZpraEfOoF4SEAvYRbmGh2809WtsEQB+P57eww+nQ7w+BwdZLpt/R qseFycXRlprODLTPQRTW94waxr2IGfg1NM4xLtcCHRbNq5TghNV+SquC08PXsBXgm9gg K7zIESQ6Gl8aFDIjP0IGZaGP4mVgfAOkkcNmGRRPWLbviJMjsN2qOpOpmf6Kxob0ZOwU sNXx2MDT7MhhuSaMIPCTSt5Tw/J/9B/q+tBv1wqMBa0x0TUF2SAclf/2N8vHJM6ID9q+ LVOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbX0yhyFqI//nQsy0RCC64M0tf6LuLdo9WsfN1HDa/qVhTKhNrl8BUURrX2hwS1Tkzd/xn X-Received: by 10.60.54.1 with SMTP id f1mr13971754oep.68.1439079902716; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:25:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150808172458.ZM14100@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:24:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <150808172317.ZM14085@torch.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to Bart Schaefer "Re: 5.0.9 eventually...?" (Aug 8, 5:23pm) References: <20150808200521.4e3c85d1@ntlworld.com> <28695.1439068936@thecus.kiddle.eu> <150808172317.ZM14085@torch.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: 5.0.9 eventually...? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii } } Has anything been done about the bug reported in 35852? } } No, nothing has been done about that. It is indeed new in 5.0.8 That was supposed to say "5.0.8-dev-1".