From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14995 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2015 20:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36200 Received: (qmail 1184 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2015 20:08:03 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:to:subject:mime-version :content-type; bh=ntp5BSrjuJzQz6kBM0yZu0/2HLkuStnkaedGf9y6OZM=; b=KOOd/cdicit+W2b6oiAoBsUqsC/shOUHLaLX2moe4nCMnIH8YMbS/ebtiswv9EsqOT knVsO6BdNGn9E7gYnbV0PD0xCkwj8EcjmCpv6QYujonVj2i6RaTD1MbErk1QiLkfUC8j nNzaNNGalDUZwrYlUbJc3/C9d2zJmwHGrJSM7kXv7VwWVhKWqT8/t1EZVB5WdhIycbia GgLOe4gjg6SHIoRoaZVkqlg2l08RBzufHvYrbcG1TBmbU2l2KiNn5pxTddknNPFaZL8M 662IXr2nsZfWGUVyjDvKUBKgfgHCkDhsGqYrRBZVWJEZBj8VWXgTncDjqPvOJVGTao4y Ur2g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnP4Sge1SvrIRqegBvtLoYrrdvDM745BGrOUr8GzReL0BPIfS7zZsngqhWCZUeiBX0ytsBt X-Received: by 10.182.213.68 with SMTP id nq4mr2681889obc.16.1439842081491; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:08:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150817130758.ZM14868@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:07:58 -0700 X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: (Fwd) Re: bug with expansion and backslashes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I suspect Oliver meant to send this to the list. --- Forwarded mail from Oliver Kiddle From: Oliver Kiddle To: Bart Schaefer Subject: Re: bug with expansion and backslashes Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:40:31 +0200 Bart wrote: > } What's not clear to me is what problem this patch was trying to solve. > > Look at workers/32186 which refers back to users/18247 and its thread. > I have no objection to backing out that change again, although it works > as expected when extendedglob is NOT set. For a 5.0.9, I think it'd be better that the change is backed out than left as it is. With regard to 18247, I think Yury's expectation for what ls *\" should be completed to is the only reasonable one. Oliver ---End of forwarded mail from Oliver Kiddle -- Barton E. Schaefer