From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15958 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2015 14:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36244 Received: (qmail 19147 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2015 14:59:18 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=0U5klK65oG9f54dzPsX88zoo2dHRRU4Gil7cW8j6fH4=; b=E67wdsr8UacRAYbKaJ7hHCIjTMxO/vV7WNkPiVdo3HIrTtcXnHHZUZ1Iz0SmEKqj/G ShMjpb7D8suxEzVxH8jNJ5ZoNKyjzXL+p9+lCw0dFXhtDTJf+up7Ol0Nv614E/JmGQqV YWUyZPDiEYB1HAxHZHeUTtDtFGeshEaVGQJzeD18UHuSwhwTye4AgWiyQrw7iYdJTuRy BwYh1Vlc3tT6kl0bYZHPFyM0pGNM+omZKPmkSbCGAudgwYMXEqqeZyxjoKe4Hd2/ml+u iu7tLIeFezDuP5wib0fQgG3JM4LyL+gGGlb/swIeOEsb4HfKguB5eBedIZ+MR2eVr4v6 bQpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPTguVOfJsHk9eZaPab++D3WMqnJreBGR99a1NEPXKsnKdxykZftUcb+1qvvEK0HPTPJjN X-Received: by 10.202.219.67 with SMTP id s64mr9731976oig.25.1439996355687; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:59:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150819075912.ZM27667@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:59:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: <2C7B5A5B-EF10-4474-94A7-34BF531D2D28@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Comments: In reply to "Jun T." "PATCH: fix a few problems of "_pids -m pattern"" (Aug 19, 10:39pm) References: <2C7B5A5B-EF10-4474-94A7-34BF531D2D28@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: PATCH: fix a few problems of "_pids -m pattern" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 19, 10:39pm, Jun T. wrote: } } (3) The patch also replaces the '${2}*' by '${2}([[:blank:]]*|)' } so that, for example, } } % gdb /path/to/ex } } does not completes the PIDs of running 'expect' (or 'expand'). This seems fine to me. "ex" is the word on the line, it's what should be used to (as precisely as possible) match the process name in ps.