From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7807 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2015 20:41:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36703 Received: (qmail 15177 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2015 20:41:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=O3le9x23VFkPZwUVUQY6ghd8ogzFeZXUNmICNIFQkpo=; b=Q98ozK2Mf5pU9FgyYoAmN9DoHGtr/eOFfim1/AJVJP3h+HeDTDQ5mxjm2bod45YDWI 2t+j3S+vTraAm6sRdwB3hUo+XQ1HpNiceaHK6n7NA+JI1hzyAK38DiiGxTgv1MkYNcyv ZOlMVD++PlOluZDhDigfaonALeQ2BIhxFp7FUfa8BMLx2YuF2NsLc2whgb6L207mxE3I fdldUkgo6jPMynX8TQznGZRShORbop84kYNSXKAYBCd8sF/mlwSBxbduEmHC6GDlJwLO 8svegnHdC6mM1o9XbvgYr39QrWVO3JbdNYbYWu9HVDy3hf/CuO458DVlkopRF7WI/o4/ yRkg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnP+6lO9VF+l/jjMBw7WeyevZhx5u7G3vnfe1EDbkP1e/kTFfmx9kFSG5lnX+TNUU3lZJYZ X-Received: by 10.60.80.131 with SMTP id r3mr15763760oex.49.1443559313322; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:41:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150929134150.ZM11773@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:41:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3D6A6B84-A584-4915-BB8F-521AB490FA01@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Comments: In reply to "Jun T." "Re: [PATCH] handle options of _arguments correctly" (Sep 30, 1:12am) References: <150928164855.ZM29167@torch.brasslantern.com> <3D6A6B84-A584-4915-BB8F-521AB490FA01@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle options of _arguments correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 30, 1:12am, Jun T. wrote: } Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle options of _arguments correctly } } 2015/09/29 08:48, Bart Schaefer wrote: } } > I don't see anything immediate (though this renders the name "singsub" } > for the array somewhat nonsensical). } } Do you mean 'singopt'? I guess it means 'single-letter option'. Yes (subst.c on the brain), and yes, which seems specifically to mean the "-s" switch ... but not very important. } I think we need explicitly pass ':' to comparguments. I was actually going to suggest that, and then stopped short because I wasn't convinced it was necessary. I think it's a good idea.