From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20304 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2015 02:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36768 Received: (qmail 9000 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2015 02:58:12 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=SoUJY21RaB2W6zZRXiJycDoq5ZR1e7+nLqrzickqvQ8=; b=KRFIYEsYc2beprenL/Whuto3XAiwUw2T5aaCUdKLYn/WrkL+apf/Wd0omkxeHj6p6f HJAaYX4rwafVwR0S/G9ofnBmaKt2+66K+jjKpoR8f/4mzEMS3vg59kJJNO7meZXr3SB/ mxksLPU/iqPYolCoWxK7TD8F53dKK3sL5sk/sPd9LH0Kpln1LxtBBHy3ipoGKEuFK0i5 YRa2DlGBk8Wu/+2eQ0ehZlaUfYx9QE12Nu/IgcLynIOJJL0WkoZXWEOxKQckhpo9nntw m7dJS0Lci27q/28f1figtfO340bjct4ySJsgEN+djrfmjd9SbX+V/YCNJGOCfEwZzauR Ja+w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHkpEZDCnRxxxekF5HkQREQ1DcKR8/HeiQG7XFsVtAGQl58hgbRW47dwwaO4MxgGwsHBjj X-Received: by 10.202.48.210 with SMTP id w201mr12984075oiw.115.1443927489836; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 19:58:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <151003195806.ZM13226@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:58:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <151003172618.ZM31496@torch.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to Bart Schaefer "Re: err_exit/err_return regression" (Oct 3, 5:26pm) References: <20150709143823.184fb4e1@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150929154327.GA11991@Qliphoth.local> <20150929195432.7b0e3525@ntlworld.com> <20150929205204.GA29608@Qliphoth.local> <150929180932.ZM9288@torch.brasslantern.com> <20151001203209.GA38889@Qliphoth.local> <151003172618.ZM31496@torch.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: err_exit/err_return regression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 3, 5:26pm, Bart Schaefer wrote: } } I'm still not entirely happy with [36707], in case anyone has any } better ideas. } } [36766] seems [to fix] an obvious former thinko, in retrospect. All } the regular tests still pass. Anyone see a problem? In fact with 36766 in place, 36707 isn't necessary any longer, so that seems to have been the root of the problem all along. I'll back out 36707.