From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36795-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 18325 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2015 22:49:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36795
Received: (qmail 27970 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2015 22:49:59 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=txLFibSt94IBwsnl02QT2lf6nJKZzNIe1agl+Ck8fHU=;
        b=EvoefV2In6Pt0eDreiSqk2Jfivhry+QtFarfxRhbpQaABlqDEjB31t6sW3Wej8I2SS
         7Ds6eXbbrxJosVdR7jWR2YxizSRzfKbYYVpO+PqzfqJ1Equp0IUPQfF6P1rVVYm6u43t
         jBekWOsMuvo/EezUIlyF6VVClBbFtv1X6RRVqg9FtipocB1Bv3xNVulXCh217xZ5m/9u
         ojfTw3ojNbSJCleKwYzlD3PRMf9R4v0r1h1bo786RuZfp/hUXBnW51qla4Fal54Dqhy9
         y1Pg6btQxD/V/lcdmcMgkZGqnvoST/zSZfj3kNf4Rry8LywXxvi6s1+gq6yvA0kJGYZs
         eEXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSf7nuX9W4fFWadkRq/2WwrIe4EbqQyHc+jGxPgPyGJ8NW4EgKe68YPDcb2R66ousVLuH6
X-Received: by 10.60.37.106 with SMTP id x10mr18270261oej.69.1444085397078;
        Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <151005154955.ZM4587@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:49:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20151005223302.GD2367@tarsus.local2>
Comments: In reply to Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
        "Re: [PATCH] Add API wrapper to ${+_comps[...]}" (Oct  5, 10:33pm)
References: <20150930182948.GD2003@tarsus.local2> 
	<151003174919.ZM31542@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<20151005215134.GA1959@tarsus.local2> 
	<151005151148.ZM4523@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<20151005223302.GD2367@tarsus.local2>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add API wrapper to ${+_comps[...]}
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 5, 10:33pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
}
} How would I handle a case such as 36725 (three patches to a single
} module)?

I'd have sent three separate messages, if they couldn't all be treated
as part of the same logical change.

} The difference between
} 
}    f() {
}      [[ $# == 1 ]] || return 2
}      (( $+_comps[$1] ))
}    }
} and
}    g() {
}      [[ $# == 1 ]] || return 2
}      (( $+_comps[$1] )) && (( $+functions[$_comps[$1]] ))
}    }
} 
} is how they handle the case 'compdef _foo foo' with _foo() not having
} being defined yet (nor marked for autoload).  Is this a common case?
} When does it happen?

Presently it doesn't EVER happen (except maybe in your startup files).
Which is why a function for (( $+_comps[$1] )) may not be very useful.

OTOH we've probably now batted this back and forth way too much, too.