From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36796-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 28942 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2015 23:01:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36796
Received: (qmail 27101 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2015 23:01:13 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=A4v6UirdKyubGOPxvg/h12/NyhJX46Vt1vGZCXqBi+0=;
        b=XtgyK9h8r1Zoj33Tpc93r9wjgmyDxpivDsrF0npXAxm4Z2QFHNkqGkrgP9cz1xUU+c
         hvD3M1nRiPM+22kZBvgy+6SncdqKCdRRDD+X7OBg9kR4RudAIcBr/xK4ibzVUF55LRAW
         N88eNBZDFKS5woWGOck1VWRJBjGfxpniuH9uBAQzp8CFbaB74DqkKwcC5HnsrTUaSfwR
         QieBglAhzGnS2oFORqDjLaE1i5dS1cfo31ADqaDjNzXzxxmKq2CVlNXlS646f9oEqib2
         MFyMcoupfE48tzl96zDbp+dXfzojRo0OPGERcnhBoTzRHZX+TlOYaRluL2t6uZRcs6n/
         DKUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl5Xd2+pRQj4g2e3y7g14fm+HqVKIcOx5Eccxat3E5Xya6aZ1VoMEVqsCfO9uwSbHCIZMJr
X-Received: by 10.202.73.66 with SMTP id w63mr17881316oia.94.1444086071810;
        Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <151005160109.ZM4599@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:01:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20151005223637.GE2367@tarsus.local2>
Comments: In reply to Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
        "Re: Proof of concept: "static" parameter scope" (Oct  5, 10:36pm)
References: <150924192305.ZM2680@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<20150925101540.5d2ded9c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> 
	<20150930203825.307d3f8f@ntlworld.com> 
	<150930172748.ZM3986@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<20151003201936.29b52aa4@ntlworld.com> 
	<20151005215514.GB1959@tarsus.local2> 
	<151005151739.ZM4535@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<20151005223637.GE2367@tarsus.local2>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: "static" parameter scope
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Oct 5, 10:36pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
}
} Okay, I understand the consistency point, but could you explain why
} "disable local" shouldn't emit "command local"?

The task of  which name / functions name / print -R $functions[name]
is to reproduce the text of the function, not its semantics.

Otherwise the next logical step would be for

    emulate zsh -c 'foo() { ... }'
    functions foo

to emit a "setopt" command along with the function definition.  Oh,
but why stop there?  I might have defined the function with all sorts
of setopts in effect, even if I didn't say "emulate" to make them
sticky.  Maybe those should be output as well ...