From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23460 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2017 03:20:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 42107 Received: (qmail 27197 invoked by uid 1010); 11 Dec 2017 03:20:41 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.27):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 2.031862 secs); 11 Dec 2017 03:20:41 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ugLzVZ sA+MpoOHroQUURkjPJNcKYjiBrDkusKo69tPU=; b=AxbMIrSLe1koBElnogo9I8 tXhQpPp+bEQp3xPO4gLuK9HlWGhg3qCtGy/y3RIx9dtTD0BKjUyil1Gw96cVFIpa +bZMQKosiJ0D/NPfIH50gRUvwY3SCWE0+Pm6UND/Bjkqchge6bt+ajGoRet7FEW5 su+8cltIOrEopef1ZLVDkgXNEl4AGJKRTlhEGoMnZKwbpiDqwe7d2Mcij4dXMM2L izOVUJR1oS3D84i5bjcgR7pKeVGT7Bnx7V9cxYC/WQBtu58KgvbUra26YOcLGLSd IT3WISKUlkdWmxFGg4tev1KzHAB3dDQj8QHK8JDLV3kHt+x0QOjz7Z5YngIeNvSA == DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ugLzVZ sA+MpoOHroQUURkjPJNcKYjiBrDkusKo69tPU=; b=iyRTcu6sqJGLzl8pgB3OMR y86o3rt4V96gJzQ3DqNnZXrtFVaV6825nChtPXmsqUYcv6hT1nGT8PdxUCcNNyNi VkzKLdDyEKjq5YTcwYFBFEvr1fHVO9S6iBXWY1hJXcw+qkDHwSvbeeB37+A9H9oT KxVEb0R1V4hUY80uuYsAwwKcZd0VMzQhYS2+7MBIbrz6ActhAy9nWASOfbSBEXKz YUAjXt9PZ1J6K/KHMImdVsma08DMFnslIFoc5GtiiH3QD6EL+SuV28oNc5ZbDGnT bJcbslFJv2FKIG1zQ1p62jPOOR5ndz49BERNLL62xCe29USX3YGjLtN95yF2/F1w == X-ME-Sender: Message-Id: <1512962434.1720169.1200616992.3194F636@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-c9e5630e Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 03:20:34 +0000 References: <86CB677F-70BF-43B2-8F6D-E8F0AC4C43A3@dana.is> <1512954420.1697620.1200536248.20F08CFE@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1512954420.1697620.1200536248.20F08CFE@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: [BUG] Redirect between two parameter assignments causes misbehaviour Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:07 +0000: > It's spinning in the 'while (1)' in gettext2() on WC_END. > > If I change the definition of WC_END to 0 then it hits the 'default' > branch of the case, returns from gettext2(), and doesn't spin. > Sorry, I meant: change it to a *non-zero* value. > Without having looked any further into it, I wonder whether we should > change WC_END to zero, so if we ever calloc() something and forget to > initialise it, it won't be mistaken for valid data.