From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43686-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5fe66fb7
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 29750 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2018 13:43:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 43686
Received: (qmail 2470 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Oct 2018 13:43:21 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.27):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. 
 Processed in 0.775474 secs); 12 Oct 2018 13:43:21 -0000
X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	daniel.shahaf.name; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:references:subject
	:in-reply-to:date; s=fm1; bh=mjhKLwRhJRlOZLHLLk5iDhUNVuvsSagEu5X
	Lm1lsmxs=; b=BdpzXvY6eljlXGG+Y6i3YHvn/bQOHU8YOANl4uZiygTj8JTP0lC
	VnhyEDQo58rYBkZff6uvT4i067N+y02nwzXvrI3E6QbcaQrN+wj+GGan6K+U+3y1
	5dC7lyaHmT+J//r7sHuVUCr/Jh5Wg1GajtfLRXxXAV0CkDAov6OzzfnYr1ifzYJj
	XHfnEcHKKcfwTHPfeAcMV83KwsNRkQtoN2y9uOi+R19WVSrDvgF2W9S5UJSTV8bq
	1pONOhlszlb1FzbmziRC4fAeYY9f0aqhP6tlKiAZ+MNiD79usqFxf/JmNG9q/rDG
	m5m/strvPneLDp/NOyigtD/axP9qizOqEfA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
	:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
	:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
	:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=mjhKLwRhJRlOZLHLLk5iDhUNVuvsSagEu5XLm1lsm
	xs=; b=qzsIxMxJvp4wQ/5XqQ2Dwhr8uQcQ3kbnos7yzP9KuCuM8UB2MnR7mPsBq
	rjeqmErjJpkbjs1ugLKXZGTkaVpADwQ4ToqlWbH+qZDQZ2JQkJZ7Ca4xocrW2RSz
	5LyELX7CrMKddV4n6Kaj8oVJnLVom3C43gvEpIOECY2UE1wW+DRq/pVrdV7rARG6
	Vw1sZ8DiSvOEvgpC8IYydWCDmQEpQ7fKEltlfmYZaa6oRvmwZmc1hMpIfQQixeya
	Zh7ba5B8CHjpGC7PAwsthZ8j5qkRqee1zKb3txJxIZfj/nc1P08YqoCtzlN0lAXt
	rBr5iH/9lxuLILv3Utfu0aLM9AiQw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:9aTAW_M4ZFIryzjLwIcnemjxQf6TdygEZNA65pc9yrZReEUhkDcGrg>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9aTAW0DJo2mmWW8waPjHwEA-zWTYk_LtJWaNzHw2J_62Rpm2x7GO8Q>
    <xmx:9aTAW7a__tsUsfxCYgxXS3m2jWWcrmU6f6JAG6PDM-v3FnqpRQp_6w>
    <xmx:9aTAW9e6JpvpKkmY_907UeDRnWkHci_20MWAPoI58-P52j02dk_yLA>
    <xmx:9aTAW9N9K09s7x_t6_OeZ21JblLoRBmOplq4bC9XA37zvAyRjuSdoA>
    <xmx:9aTAW_V7SILAbvS2GwMYT3ZxvAq550WXM3szMJgUhjjdF2xGZ6G0OQ>
    <xmx:9qTAWzcqMvfTDVzEFP8pHMiWbPOZGmcoLz3dEI8-X1qHoTQkkG1MCA>
Message-Id: <1539351797.1194808.1539818208.4B58E8C9@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6804a824
References: <20181012134037.16689-1-danielsh@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
 <20181012134037.16689-2-danielsh@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add-zle-hook-widget: Add a missing arithmetic evaluation
 to the new index's computation.
In-Reply-To: <20181012134037.16689-2-danielsh@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:43:17 +0000

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:40 +0000:
> +++ b/Functions/Misc/add-zle-hook-widget
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ function add-zle-hook-widget {
> -	    i=${${(On@)${(@M)extant_hooks[@]#<->:}%:}[i]:-0}+1
> +	    (( i = ${${(On@)${(@M)extant_hooks[@]#<->:}%:}[i]:-0} + 1 ))

Never mind, Matthew just pointed out to me that the code was correct
as is (assigning to integers implicitly does evaluation).  I'll skip
this patch.