From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43778-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 28f2afd8 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14132 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2018 22:46:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43778 Received: (qmail 112 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Nov 2018 22:46:55 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.29):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 4.886643 secs); 06 Nov 2018 22:46:55 -0000 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:in-reply-to :references:date; s=fm1; bh=fqsEkJqFyPjibclky2ZoF0vca+lpTi8q1/KA T0doUfg=; b=k74OQ1BBPq7FnILgbbWEyg/kO7Q0/gZbkT9mjCGp6YwFQ86nIJoP l/5adAWQKaJukNtYro5dlgnEJ5297Wul+t+hUKaezXDfZjMaQ2ZiwHokedVS6MS4 9R3USmadR5Xod5AsdIRo2VtYxrnFMw5vFR3a/yFCOaXg677OW5gra8ffr/f+r9vZ FUPqCGpAg3yZAJRrzUjWI+vS00XpCPOuTer7AgnGCicR3r2UAY9CiAJVjt1UIRx1 xZFKl/ET9FknRoP5Kb3pa+MTku8AywnD3GCSijaOm4YGVkGv9Y2nzhW+MKKPqQnD zGtGSM/yPu+seqZEXxdvOBqSZvAlyemANA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=fqsEkJqFyPjibclky2ZoF0vca+lpTi8q1/KAT0doU fg=; b=QExjT88hrAfhntEDLavAAJdCu2khhqBERIzOVOH5EvzRLOZdq43Nof+Lg 4SgS9Obwcuxh/qkJKgjhWHUDfA0LSUu5etsxdmB5VMnx2f5PtNFSD7E2Erux8g0k Xr0lAQ88PXY4waDpPrg15KtPvDlCz/8q/rTBLu0RaDXsUIdJa76c2FDIJPJi4J4V jKanzhnJXsb+x/Axhp+vvqiRfh+jyjXkuB8sxgloASBX70RD7KjGHpfdkFKNUU/e FAYxDUvaEXXuIEtIGBAIfMgQKY+6k+mQlzAqEpRfOecANAdDHLvq59WNtHVlUgGS XXGVc4YuuP1Zoq0BNZI9ZeFXImzdQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Message-Id: <1541543747.2475810.1568038456.0FCE8467@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d469da0c Subject: Re: Should there be a Zsh release for true-color support to adopt earlier? In-Reply-To: References: <58111-1540942908.680582@SXAw.BXd_.-x5N> <14759-1541295720.747208@yAOj.Gon2.-2mF> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 22:35:47 +0000 Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:22 +0100: > Hello > Could there be a release made shortly to introduce true color support > possibly early, without possible complications when other changes > arise, and without waiting a half year for it to happen? > I don't see anything stopping us from doing a "development" release, 5.6.1-test-0. I don't have an opinion on whether to issue a 5.7. That depends on what other changes have been made since 5.6, and I don't have time to review 'git log' currently to assess that. I won't be available to RM. > There's a matter of testing the patches. I'm running patched Zsh with > true-color syntax-highlighting themes from yesterday. I think I could > possibly stress-test the patches for about 2 weeks before the release? > And people would run Git-built Zsh for that time, but not utilizing > the support (unless I release some 24-bit themes early in F-Sy-H, then > some number of people could be testing it too).