From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ffd41035 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 19:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7202 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2018 19:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43878 Received: (qmail 17436 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Dec 2018 19:23:04 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.100.2/25112. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(64.147.123.25):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 6.243801 secs); 09 Dec 2018 19:23:04 -0000 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:in-reply-to:date :references; s=fm2; bh=BSn1p3UBf1c+XDwV4mHSrTfoEJ8U0vHYqRVSqxOi2 FM=; b=uQCiljzOZtOcx6OH27TYgiIIknTtIfvmcsjBAJE7W4Kkpoj90d0WDNCuW Uzr/2l0125DatxjBHl2/OsI0uspUucD+MYiIrNv30aYr8m5G7VkKtRVF/gm3LtDS MXotw1W63X5GXMtprQJL2Avr84JrOnVIZ2takyvv4PGQzB31vs4NbqmQ6uOfx5Z2 bhbYmYDq7DA0dYH8LEap2aKirXBSQ2WGMNfOqNMTEadtrnXyfOyKv/dMxvN5XYZ/ Hop4o/Rc/OcVmBlrdm2tpDefJchcFz3IffSmXP9K0xQ5D7rHN6LFaFZW68o6rp+9 rsS/k1ROTnxlJDrzBE6aeDREqP2Vg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=BSn1p3UBf1c+XDwV4mHSrTfoEJ8U0vHYqRVSqxOi2 FM=; b=YYJqAW86RMoYbuwX8MvWVDlf6bo0+hXRqLNDc97Kja6fa6guDUt64Rb3w 524/dvg2tNYUp7pFhkOZj29n6iu18Nq0vIhO7PLQIHNAJ2tA5QD/ZIGyhjJLyq4b fQ1eEpz7MZiZm+AAYaPUVXP9OD2wWw60YMMswmNR9EzusDScyfLwDnDPgPZyd9Oj eLYoutAewb39n/kJUxckYI9PD4elo9pLqPt/HgWMHMcKP+VO5kxnbbz43swgCf7s 8XmbklZVGbJKUxtQfuecGwdhXdKsAaWWp+AT8DPRB2jQ+Fmc0Y0IVkC1WDD/nTDy 1R4lDor+hanwBsv8X5FNbZfAT7H9Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudegfedguddvfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecu fedttdenucenucfjughrpefkhffvggfgtgfoufgjffhfsehtjeertdertdejnecuhfhroh hmpeffrghnihgvlhcuufhhrghhrghfuceougdrshesuggrnhhivghlrdhshhgrhhgrfhdr nhgrmhgvqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugdrshesuggrnhhivghlrdhshh grhhgrfhdrnhgrmhgvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Message-Id: <1544382814.2476211.1603820784.4D71E3B7@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-2f590f9a Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re=3A=20=5BBUG=5D=20General=20?= =?utf-8?Q?256=20colors=20bug=20=E2=80=93=20z?= =?utf-8?Q?le=5Fhighlight=20/=20fg=5F?= =?utf-8?Q?start=5Fcode=2C=20etc=2E=20i?= =?utf-8?Q?s=20not=20respected=20=28w?= =?utf-8?Q?as=3A=20highlight=20test?= =?utf-8?Q?=20cases=29?= In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 19:13:34 +0000 References: <2362-1541646201.813952@nGIL.zWP_.YhaK> <20626-1541726901.821000@xGvJ.shtD.SkCN> <31159-1543080743.164776@h8df.-SiL.hblq> Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote on Fri, 07 Dec 2018 21:26 +0100: > Following Daniel's request of a minimal test case that makes the > problem visible: > Thanks for the test case. > Could the problem be fixed, .. ASAP? It collides with my work of > providing X04 tests and is a blocker for making a new Zsh > release Why should it be a blocker? (I don't disagree; I just don't see the reason.) I ran the minimal reproducer in 5.6.2 and in current master and I get the same behaviour in both of them ("trueCDE|39| word2 word3", the whole thing in red), so it's not a regression. > I think Oliver touched the responsible code lately, as for > true-color (not 256 color, with or withoutzsh/nearcolor), the > zle_highlight processing works, i.e. I'm getting, e.g.: > > 0m27m24mCDE|38;2;0;204;0|tCDE|38;2;204;0;0|rCDE|39|CDE|38;2;0;204;0|ueCDE|39| Cheers, Daniel