From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12788 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2002 09:32:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Feb 2002 09:32:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8961 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2002 09:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16714 Received: (qmail 8947 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2002 09:32:37 -0000 From: Sven Wischnowsky MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15482.1151.781656.972208@wischnow.berkom.de> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:31:43 +0100 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: fatal flaw zsh 4.0.1 on irix 6.3 & 6.5: suspend "ls -l|less" then resume hangs In-Reply-To: <200108010835.KAA01552@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> References: <200108010835.KAA01552@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under 21.5 (patch 3) "asparagus" XEmacs Lucid Since that old while-loop patch came up again, I want to remember everyone that I think we haven't done anything about that Irix-bug yet (unless I've missed something?). The last message in the thread was 15557: > Timothy Miller wrote: > > > ... > > > > I just manually changed config.h to not define HAVE_KILLPG, cleaned and > > recompiled everything, and it all seems to work, except for make check C02 > > and Y* which were expected not to work anyway. > > So, which solution do you all prefer? 1) adding a killpg() macro in some > header file, 2) changing all killpg()s to kill(-...) or 3) changing configure > to not use killpg() on Irix? > > I'd prefer 1) or 3) -- with 2) someone could sometime use killpg() > because he doesn't know about this. It seems that the bug could be fixed by using kill(-...) instead of killpg(). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@berkom.de