From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@berkom.de>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Redirection completion
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:58:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15500.32700.620588.852242@wischnow.berkom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15500.28153.769884.199234@wischnow.berkom.de>
I wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm not going to commit this patch before I get replies, but I like
> it. A lot. Because it makes things easier without losing power.
> One thing we could think about is a standard for offering more
> information in the context name. I used parts separated by hyphens
> becuase that's what we used before for sub-commands, but maybe there's
> a better way or more places where we can offer more information.
I forgot to say: somehow I think the way this is handled now is
connected to the problem with default completions. My thoughts are
very fuzzy, though. For values and redirections we now have a (what I
consider) clean way to give default completions. I know that the
my-accounts thing is on a different level, but does it have to be?
Does anyone have the same feeling? Any ideas?
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@berkom.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-11 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-08 12:33 Peter Stephenson
2002-03-08 12:54 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-08 14:06 ` Peter Stephenson
2002-03-08 14:10 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-11 8:42 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-11 9:58 ` Sven Wischnowsky [this message]
2002-03-11 10:54 ` Peter Stephenson
2002-03-11 11:16 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-11 11:29 ` Peter Stephenson
2002-03-11 12:08 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-11 14:01 ` Peter Stephenson
2002-03-11 16:56 ` Bart Schaefer
2002-03-12 9:03 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-12 13:16 ` Oliver Kiddle
2002-03-13 9:25 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-13 16:55 ` Peter Stephenson
2002-03-14 12:03 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-13 17:58 ` Oliver Kiddle
2002-03-13 18:19 ` Bart Schaefer
2002-03-14 13:51 ` Oliver Kiddle
2002-03-14 14:41 ` Peter Stephenson
2002-03-14 14:43 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2002-03-08 13:20 ` Oliver Kiddle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15500.32700.620588.852242@wischnow.berkom.de \
--to=wischnow@berkom.de \
--cc=zsh-workers@sunsite.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).