From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-44339-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ebfbcb9a
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Mon, 20 May 2019 11:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 18358 invoked by alias); 20 May 2019 11:12:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 44339
Received: (qmail 4174 invoked by uid 1010); 20 May 2019 11:12:03 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <p.stephenson@samsung.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25454. spamassassin: 3.4.2.  
 Clear:RC:0(210.118.77.12):SA:0(-7.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 2.03065 secs); 20 May 2019 11:12:03 -0000
X-Envelope-From: p.stephenson@samsung.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.samsung.com designates 210.118.77.12 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.w1.samsung.com 20190520111125euoutp02bbd3f93dd31b26d9b5fec295a71ce28f~gX7E2ezkB1674516745euoutp02W
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com;
	s=mail20170921; t=1558350685;
	bh=gyJfFt8AV2CdQlrg+v9gBLBsFDA0kBtVDf6sgRgqN1Q=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ur99gqazKAV4hcBzkI5mhf043SpYwT9lgNuFc4QIp0lsZGuJhrsH5cmvfVk/fKeWZ
	 xWZvk9qgoDH8snlcr1pv5MoewSzR55Fpf7Cln1U59yCOuvAe7s5yGxg+E8lUsB4bNB
	 T92RPS+8pcW1Y2hmgqVbPm1VuBgevzDZPuu+bhZM=
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b8fff700000010e5-7f-5ce28b5c052f
Message-ID: <1558350683.5749.2.camel@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: Incorrect cursor position when ZLE_RPROMPT_INDENT=0 (with a
 fix)
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 12:11:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAKiz1a_JJAiRRECu7ATTBk=yYbfNZ1g8U0ACbAziGMSAN_C0-g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWy7djPc7qx3Y9iDM5sZbI42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGa1zNzAXnGGqmNYylbWBsZWpi5GTQ0LARGLRhplsXYxcHEIC
	Kxgl9qz4xA7h9DFJ/Ly5hQnC6WWSWPV/GjtMy5G576CqljNKrF7VzgKSAKuaOQEqcYZRorH/
	LFTiAqPEgxPRIDavgKHEyiV3mUFsYQF/iQXLG9hAbDag+NRNsxlBbBEBSYlrzafBbBYBVYkX
	bxcDzeHg4BQIlFh3xQTiCA2JDTePMUGMFJQ4OfMJ2CpmAXmJ7W/nMIPcICHwmE3ix9WLjCC9
	EgIuEusmukL0Cku8Or4F6hkZif875zNB1LczSqyZ9JodwulhlNh09A4jRJW1RN9tiEHMApoS
	63fpQ4QdJXbO+MsMMZ9P4sZbQYgb+CQmbZsOFeaV6GgTgqhWk9jRtBXqGhmJp2sUJjAqzULy
	wCwkD8xCWLWAkXkVo3hqaXFuemqxcV5quV5xYm5xaV66XnJ+7iZGYBo4/e/41x2M+/4kHWIU
	4GBU4uH1mP4wRog1say4MvcQowQHs5IIr7H6/Rgh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivNUM
	D6KFBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjKFqntf6IszOW/38POMnd8uO145PAt25xdiV3+/Qk/vd
	6Rw8WbEtfNZa3Wnqq7Y2+LPd0QrZdr9zV7T/Pikbv8Jvt1Zq2yY4uz1dPdnRnSfGeF+csU7C
	fAPvtRd3GR60ZFj2tyDKLElXY9rD13fmrIj3j5PxiFhmdjDd4i/zvjU6e3avnLzkrRJLcUai
	oRZzUXEiABz7VGv/AgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xu7ox3Y9iDNafF7Y42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFF6NkX5pSWpChn5xSW2StGGFkZ6hpYWekYmlnqGxuaxVkamSvp2NimpOZllqUX6dgl6
	Ga1zNzAXnGGqmNYylbWBsZWpi5GTQ0LAROLI3HfsXYxcHEICSxkl9s8/CZWQkfh05SM7hC0s
	8edaFxtEUTeTxLy3t1hBEkICZxglDh9Kg7AvMEqsvBUIYvMKGEqsXHKXGcQWFvCVOD+hgwXE
	ZgOKT900mxHEFhGQlLjWfBrMZhFQlXjxdjFQDQcHp0CgxLorJhAj17NLNNzwALGZBTQlWrf/
	hrpHQ2LDzWNMEKsEJU7OfMICUSMvsf3tHOYJjEKzkLTMQlI2C0nZAkbmVYwiqaXFuem5xUZ6
	xYm5xaV56XrJ+bmbGIGBv+3Yzy07GLveBR9iFOBgVOLh/TDlYYwQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEV5j
	9fsxQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxhNgf6ZyCwlmpwPjMq8knhDU0NzC0tDc2NzYzMLJXHeDoGD
	MUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRTB9TBycUg2MhyL9mpLblpyp+ifl1n0vs7trs/ennCVpevHm33T1VHY/
	nxSwm9lqtT/fcn+1m7MWqXpW/lyh5vDjxd++oOkdX0Pc2BpsfHiFvsZsup/d0V682Zft/7XW
	Skk9o9Qn7rX8+59yT885fSdfXJAz7Njv+htttb+FNvEaHzbnuaS+4Pmba5/t9NmVWIozEg21
	mIuKEwG9DwT5kgIAAA==
X-CMS-MailID: 20190520111124eucas1p2a05edbda7fc70dce117be63a09b5261c
X-Msg-Generator: CA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RootMTR: 20190520110912epcas2p4276e67e6bc253fd7ee632ee5591f13ae
X-EPHeader: CA
CMS-TYPE: 201P
X-CMS-RootMailID: 20190520110912epcas2p4276e67e6bc253fd7ee632ee5591f13ae
References: <CAN=4vMpx_B5TRNQzDAvBoTFszoKea2=uQr5xjd0vZVH6py+oVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH+w=7bYdLornMBJmjE_RHgiRcywT05FXkOQdSapZHkdT30X0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN=4vMozz41wH3=ZOoe=tAx70bXnD1ieZFScY7Zauby-33UcXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN=4vMpWA+2zeRjthq4aeXyb7AAc40BpfEz8O0Uaj23a1O_F6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN=4vMqaGT+baaxJsGS1TC9Y9EER3_sRiQn-AM2LkQ=cVp=1Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH+w=7buWyujVw-PqWuB40ywQ5BrePrTYWdkkB1Q6RSwuVeG8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN=4vMr46PsxS-+gDSBU=mGeGMLtWsRxTp9wMAB87qL12serNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<68081d8c-1aa6-203b-eb6c-e2d048de1340@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
	<CAN=4vMo9oZ19n5kwNiNDjSHQAnNJHXRBPSfZstN7QOvXgN3WrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKiz1a8wkSkCz6snNrQRdS3npNkMdC-yUgL7SKnKwHL_RZVSdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN=4vMo9uK1BPqwAF=i7pEbOVuhhSWxVXi75Wb-pMjo9rvkRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CGME20190520110912epcas2p4276e67e6bc253fd7ee632ee5591f13ae@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
	<CAKiz1a_JJAiRRECu7ATTBk=yYbfNZ1g8U0ACbAziGMSAN_C0-g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 07:07 -0400, Charles Blake wrote:
> On my Linux virtual terminal, I get your observed incorrect at-2 unpatched
> behavior with zsh -df, but with just zsh I get the correct (past 2)
> behavior even without the patch.

Could it be picking up a different termcap / terminfo entry in the two cases?

pws