From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12823 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 13:18:09 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 13:18:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 21407 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 13:18:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 17742 Received: (qmail 21395 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 13:18:00 -0000 From: Sven Wischnowsky MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15766.65051.994592.223916@wischnow.berkom.de> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:20:27 +0200 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: For loop bug In-Reply-To: <20020914143925.EDDE21C0EB@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> References: <20020913233156.324A31C0E9@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> <20020914143925.EDDE21C0EB@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.5 (patch 5) "beets" XEmacs Lucid Peter Stephenson wrote: > I did, however: after fifteen hours, it finally occurred to me that > where there's an or there's an and. This replaces the previous patch > and fixes the equivalent bug, too. (I've subtly changed a couple of > comments owing to pure pedantry.) All tests still pass. I'll still > wait and see if Sven has any comment. Sorry for the delay, I was (and actually still am ;-) on holiday. The patch looks sensible as far as I can see. I'm wondering why we didn't see the bug before. Weird. Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@berkom.de