From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 72ebae22 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23803 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2019 15:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 45091 Received: (qmail 25532 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Dec 2019 15:38:09 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.102.1/25663. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(210.118.77.11):SA:0(-7.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.687706 secs); 19 Dec 2019 15:38:09 -0000 X-Envelope-From: p.stephenson@samsung.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.samsung.com designates 210.118.77.11 as permitted sender) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout1.w1.samsung.com 20191219153732euoutp01a846ab2229a192f08d0d31ed8ef7da86~hz9OZ1pda0827808278euoutp01g X-AuditID: cbfec7f2-f0bff7000001ef66-e4-5dfb993c1846 Message-ID: <1576769851.4486.16.camel@samsung.com> Subject: Re: { exit } always { foo } From: Peter Stephenson To: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:37:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: <3d6e4d83-5ec1-4d04-8d3f-374811d4eb49@www.fastmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWy7djPc7o2M3/HGny9xmpxsPkhkwOjx6qD H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mq5vPMVasIG1Ysvjw2wNjAtYuhg5OCQETCR+PijpYuTiEBJY wSjxdeMMVginj0ni1vvzUE4vk8S51lVADidYx9fnX1ggEssZJXbOeMgGV7Xl0ywmCOcMo8T3 qY+hMhcYJZ50/mUE6ecVMJLoeP0LbJawgIrEngPzWEBsNgFDiambZoPViAhISlxrPg1mswio SuyafpgV5FpOAReJ3v40iDM0JDbcPMYEMVJQ4uTMJ2BjmAXkJZq3zmYG2Ssh8JhNYu3CRlaI T10k3m/OhegVlnh1fAs7hC0jcXpyDwtEfTujxJpJr9khnB5GiU1H7zBCVFlL9N2+yAgyiFlA U2L9Ln2IsKPEqofzoebzSdx4KwhxA5/EpG3TmSHCvBIdbUIQ1WoSO5q2MkKEZSSerlGYwKg0 C8kDs5A8MAth1QJG5lWM4qmlxbnpqcWGeanlesWJucWleel6yfm5mxiBieD0v+OfdjB+vZR0 iFGAg1GJh9ch7XesEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHe2x0/Y4V4UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInz Gi96GSskkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgZKjs+/ujLy3SjN/SrjN59tITKbcuTky+sXlJ0b2f d52EP0mV9nCJnpDcxRjyNPFuVxczv7pQ3JtbTvbHNbMDw1/sjU7cfevqn4/u8vpq6n84pkeJ L7ujGzTvnmjSY/vOil2b53raJ+y/s8vke0NwQE92fU1yUvcSDrfulQuXXfkh7z5h9uqZSizF GYmGWsxFxYkABVfnCQADAAA= X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4PV3rmb9jDWZsNbM42PyQyYHRY9XB D0wBjFF6NkX5pSWpChn5xSW2StGGFkZ6hpYWekYmlnqGxuaxVkamSvp2NimpOZllqUX6dgl6 Gdc3nmIt2MBaseXxYbYGxgUsXYycHBICJhJfn38Bsrk4hASWMkq8OHWRESIhI/Hpykd2CFtY 4s+1LjaIom4mif9T25ggnDOMEi+f3QPrEBK4wChx5as/iM0rYCTR8foXK4gtLKAisefAPLB1 bAKGElM3zQarFxGQlLjWfBrMZhFQldg1/TBQPQcHp4CLRG9/GsT8q4wS79tXgvUyC2hKtG7/ DXWRhsSGm8eYIHYJSpyc+QSqRl6ieets5gmMQrOQtMxCUjYLSdkCRuZVjCKppcW56bnFRnrF ibnFpXnpesn5uZsYgcG/7djPLTsYu94FH2IU4GBU4uF1SPsdK8SaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmE93bH z1gh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjKZAD01klhJNzgdGZl5JvKGpobmFpaG5sbmxmYWSOG+HwMEY IYH0xJLU7NTUgtQimD4mDk6pBkaH277FB1IvuPlE8R+s4X5T9+JNQezTrPXFc7QEF80NzNsa GGskvCUlRy+ofNb3dYxh3zJdZVu+fpgiH3bA4Hpr2Orl+3+7Rx9pZZF+0Hdx1783Jv/0umVO cT6vZeVcePX+qto9QSJP7c3mu/2W9b3vZxt+PUvxaLOTwxPJVav0lOfoexxrzFViKc5INNRi LipOBADwncmTlAIAAA== X-CMS-MailID: 20191219153731eucas1p184dc3a1f0967a9af2844817456cf854e X-Msg-Generator: CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RootMTR: 20191219153007eucas1p1b03a7775d7a38004385e39953d0796bd X-EPHeader: CA CMS-TYPE: 201P X-CMS-RootMailID: 20191219153007eucas1p1b03a7775d7a38004385e39953d0796bd References: <20191218052322.k744i7dwonwgeh33@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <3d6e4d83-5ec1-4d04-8d3f-374811d4eb49@www.fastmail.com> On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 15:28 +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, 18 Dec 2019 05:23 +00:00: > > > > So, personally, I would find it more intuitive to change the implementation to > > match the documentation, than the other way around. > I'll wait a bit more for feedback.  If the decision ends up being to change the > implementation to match the documentation, I'll at least document it as > a bug/incompatibility, or maybe fix it if I manage that. I don't think it's that big a deal either way as long as the inconsistency gets fixed; I'd be happy to leave it to what ever feels most natural if you're using the feature in question. cheers pws