From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8491 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2016 05:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 39204 Received: (qmail 25087 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2016 05:57:45 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.192.194):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.741906 secs); 07 Sep 2016 05:57:45 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at brasslantern.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=EcMVdNUa/8Hep9iRgvd7a17Bhxi6S7ZZLKJXVYK+t6M=; b=A7gDVMhEJSWuW7dhe0x1TclpAhyUlTqLt0P8do11QnD3LDuXDUH6VJK8Tyk9X4tkmV T6LCD4kQUAM+u6L7GQxrtT3KiChtGq08aw0bT9HK9P4DBKug/4f5bAxVLWociElPWAKt BLNT7ZbJ8oZ6wFjK2Tt47ctaOatdNh9xrqCHm1St4MtaK4+FeT/18I8NXhRRBc+Rw4bI MdkMqX38J+bgLqsERVw90qA+DBxp6tL3H7TGBJRp0ICFnHZnaZopQ9i93xOKgCLgXXNX KXkPqYsEgL2TNwVxvM/fAMqK5rACYhKy+ws7Ry4GLW3ZqfvvUDwfGQ+BfZYJetgpB8/X zO9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=EcMVdNUa/8Hep9iRgvd7a17Bhxi6S7ZZLKJXVYK+t6M=; b=CScIe0xAf1EavnR6vu8pCcPz5VfLEnIOf5xp23DQgiHfQFltsBiaVxbOfjW7iMbCPt sqrqK2Sff6od41Z+ZTRJItcrZiHKjaW9nFIEMm7Ge9VY7rqdkMK9r3duoSIzu/2kr5gV /q8PFJ2FeEWUqbuRaOfWLwh2d6k8B7OiHsSGUdUrnPBoyHbAKKsjFt6g9PI3vH9nnUep rz7HytqQhT0xhsUPCMufeXKuTOd2spqArXwl/sAht7GBNBvdrDBSlNrX26xZiyFn53fi /q/zCanmgQDU7NtZ4flqteNN09D0W7CgXTzGfzBMR079te5ADlm/vDQAtirKv0L14GZe 2HRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN+IMbd03ozbFqgnXZ6yWgzQTh72rKtgh3/ExmCN9GiaRXOlSgounpFEe39ulzSlA== X-Received: by 10.98.70.8 with SMTP id t8mr79910802pfa.36.1473227858722; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:57:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <160906225736.ZM11304@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 22:57:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160903210630.54164-1-tgyurci@gmail.com> Comments: In reply to Teubel Gyorgy "[PATCH] Fix ENV handling in sh/ksh emulation" (Sep 3, 11:06pm) References: <20160903210630.54164-1-tgyurci@gmail.com> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ENV handling in sh/ksh emulation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Aside that this patch also included two other hunks changing isset(INTERACTIVE) to the equivalent "interact" macro instead. This makes them all the same in init.c, except for one use of unset(INTERACTIVE) instead of !interact. However, other files don't seem to be consistent about making use of this macro, nor even about whether unset() vs. !isset() is chosen. I'm not suggesting we go to any special effort to clean this up, but I'd rather not sneak this kind of thing into unrelated diffs (at least, not without mentioning it) because, along with things like whitespace clean-up, it makes it difficult to tell from a delta what changes are semantically meaningful.