From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23351 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2016 13:57:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 39376 Received: (qmail 15513 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2016 13:57:52 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.220.44):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.795755 secs); 17 Sep 2016 13:57:52 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at brasslantern.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=8pYNudfI2AdpnZqfQ9jvVVhq6NSbdioUl6Lgk8HnTCE=; b=KzjxA27mvuuFlyIbePT354TsMuoSRbVFpTfQD5bmXTS0QZUCTft6qr8Dzk+p6Y4EoB mTK6JeXJ2SgzNkhWBCQOdKC+PrKVQVYzP8pZfZ4WbSnBJedcg0kc5BbkotzH1zBv7lDE GqSyasscsHirECQXVHaJRtcZYf0SraPNjDPChTB+GxJXlrzB0rlNlnR6kRqjMx2BfPIM UtgN44A6w3jpehDUJ6R5/DeMHmnvBXRB5k2OZ5uV1Kbw/5TvSmGUflk04aPFm2fO29rS ZkPvuPnjGmtY8u0ClOkJ6l0RY/C/1gHNK2y7DaukZq+jE0XCai8HB+6fdZNeslQ33K35 F+SQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=8pYNudfI2AdpnZqfQ9jvVVhq6NSbdioUl6Lgk8HnTCE=; b=huov3hFcwccBpEWoVRx+S/W5dwrHRoFHfDSa4fYMlrOajwUkuUQ8j6j9h68xm/NwPu ElyJRtbgknkzG3H6c22pC5R3iY/e2fQkh2jvd2+QND+mjJAOl74udl/eGTbCpkhc3fA0 rXPepJyef8Ui3zvOdji/wJb7qeNAdjr8Gapxv06ErcBJzAgnY2vYqW5DAtf5Ytd5jD/l pxNtqKv/wAVge2X2YAa3HFMeKhLq2Ag2i9BBLV7+b5HIHLarn2tf6o/xxI8YlQhgMgbX SM4UDn4jLSE6XfmJedKM45yf1JAayBxI55ov3zFZPqr1Vofr+Y6Dsf1Daazwr78ibb35 dYKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOVQ4058wV471DBTs3FsrVISR32lAIoYA5HDGE6fyQ97ugUykFq23dc6V1z9dmFpA== X-Received: by 10.66.10.170 with SMTP id j10mr31589922pab.3.1474120201960; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 06:50:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <160917065018.ZM29167@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 06:50:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160917063258.GA26826@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> Comments: In reply to Daniel Shahaf "'compadd -P' matches $PREFIX greedily" (Sep 17, 6:32am) References: <20160917063258.GA26826@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: 'compadd -P' matches $PREFIX greedily MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 17, 6:32am, Daniel Shahaf wrote: } } This patch makes skipping the -P prefix an all-or-nothing affair: the -P } prefix will only be skipped if it the longest common prefix it and } ${PREFIX} have is equal to the -P prefix. I had to read that sentence three times before I figured out that you were saying what I thought you ought to be saying. :-) } Thoughts? Seems sensible to me, I can't think of any expected behavior that it would break.