From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8246 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2016 17:19:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 39573 Received: (qmail 7627 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2016 17:19:20 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.192.174):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.481026 secs); 05 Oct 2016 17:19:20 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at brasslantern.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=XWIi8PObtR0tW95BZBkV2rW948VbSEYVLUmVTA+55b0=; b=CkkeNrYgXgAOejdcmcTbo5z6WzaAe/btUvszoAe8lXdYywXef6M/Qqv38xMwJIo68n UP8615lUzTuT85BIYZvwYUxtTV5jwxBzlpIkDlTSDpp5FbOE404w0DjPvWYtO3uUHb0g eaSzsQnKUqQW9tUNbibe+cFuJrv3eDXsoAmubSWxPbixijZdG+RCyGQfBBa8d5kgDH7B XtRjD7jdIMC7xhA5mTohdPo8m3FHzT4/n8SHFtjpwqcD/fVkwV6BJOC8WWELSDhFR8J7 cwdbiMszQboTIqzkPGSvp8Qu3VypFonXZsFptFcqjWdy84/AWfW710Hmc5wdfwtuPyw7 EWjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=XWIi8PObtR0tW95BZBkV2rW948VbSEYVLUmVTA+55b0=; b=YINA2Bv1ZaEnUEsEtVLYuZoV0mGG+nV3ls1WAGRNGS8EXWm1l4PNYW3Fdr3yh+oGrB WY40AQgvbqlxHbOYmYIzehNlUVWGtPKDVkDo8Fzydl7RfGkt2T9bM9ulBGtdg4ntmaAV tnQzvVfwMv6Ehvj8QpTTwA91WNM9qbo/GwRaO68eNCp5HA6PG/7mlqJCNq7WAK493pJP dLjA7eb/UhhkqWVyAZs/mX+yg9VCSrAyEMaROo9Z0Oe4qSpYwOpAYGM03o78my+QZPbP 2qFewfWFWw4PUKEhdB+GRURznWcLbOPwlCK4CQrMAbhvgs6/ic9MmSxYECgcgEHZhZyk wmYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnYUHKYF+LrvFMVjXBtWKya4K2iOrCkBdZ2S/LzPn87/GW6B8AqqvcGPGfL6grHzg== X-Received: by 10.98.10.145 with SMTP id 17mr17595410pfk.144.1475687948870; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:19:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <161005101938.ZM12590@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:19:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161005080921.GB26647@raspi> Comments: In reply to "Ghjuvan' Lacambre" "Bug in ZSH's vi emulation" (Oct 5, 10:09am) References: <20161005080921.GB26647@raspi> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Bug in ZSH's vi emulation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 5, 10:09am, Ghjuvan' Lacambre wrote: } } 'd.' isn't a valid action as '.' is not a valid motion, yet 'd.' is } recorded as the last action called. When using '.', 'd.' will } recursively call itself Confirmed. Seems to be a problem with calling startvichange(1) before calling getvirange(), so the input is captured as a change event whether it succeeds or fails. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the vi emulation code to see how to back out of startvichange().