From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-39809-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7911 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2016 18:54:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 39809
Received: (qmail 27119 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2016 18:54:04 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vk0-f46.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.213.46):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 0.975671 secs); 02 Nov 2016 18:54:04 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.213.46 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=FoED+oPZbaStFZr4//yHzzMw7Rt+Ugio99IOXAastAg=;
        b=WCnw1lIbfCpkJuONvzbtbg54YlCO7bR/xrTR+7jn0aVSwEaQIqIQvBpgqwGp84jqYt
         VANTAtKuqvc7j6nHcOLvVbjiP/xKxYEJTc+Z1NINna6u8uUaSwGZiY3Luraj7mGzAxFd
         Ause+lus6b6piKuHDaxT67oBCpyN/1Acf8aRoCnQegfERcH2ehT1YDppeOaijH8PrrgO
         2zNtDjbg+VCpSRAE1Rc+COAQZtYoTYx63YbUh5viQn2oj28mAXpvJyPELGQliKBJwx2X
         6oMCFVDBTAj0YZB+vhc34LzvNfYSewo2cTVNllIvRy6xCCn2CMtu9jvWfgKrI40Hyr/V
         5pKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=FoED+oPZbaStFZr4//yHzzMw7Rt+Ugio99IOXAastAg=;
        b=Hq8O+A33CCrVxVbxx/qpUNavg4Eoe6mODfOQ54WEzDWL0GLzf/TDzPZnlOffjmDQbD
         7sDny/uIkVxJMH3kdjA5lBerCRgS5ZXd9TV2ErEDaoV9BYnE+9aJngtQqGGkwRfXe4/Q
         50OttBAnV6fMM7gyUsuDBhj0UKP4HALHIDpIoKqM29UnwIczKLXHtPG/BQr0uaKA0tJ2
         cN7kU8E2S5RfOykylqSsC9hOI4lSAaUJXcr10HPS4vEu3XK9Yf9ouIsgNB5fbzN5FmxT
         IYvjII/LgXyClF/1Ti5pW8rAY3JiLWb6UV2y/BayLvgZxzjTb1VgKsLAnWp4BtcyOKZK
         G/Vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd6sxC3aENpkXDrd/pYElzPhWGvI8PMMzOucM1QcscbTFBiamjVMzrWUG4fg5wplQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.254.135 with SMTP id l129mr4001055vki.36.1478112382147;
        Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <161102114648.ZM32705@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:46:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <11719.1478105483@hydra.kiddle.eu>
Comments: In reply to Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
        "Re: Bug in ZSH's vi emulation" (Nov  2,  5:51pm)
References: <20161005080921.GB26647@raspi> 
	<161005101938.ZM12590@torch.brasslantern.com> 
	<20161102045925.GA6763@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> 
	<11719.1478105483@hydra.kiddle.eu>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Bug in ZSH's vi emulation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Nov 2,  5:51pm, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
} Subject: Re: Bug in ZSH's vi emulation
}
} Daniel Shahaf wrote:
} > Is it simply a matter of setting vichgbufptr to 0 if getvirange()
} > returns -1?
} 
} Not really. If we want a quick fix for 5.3 then either that or checking
} virangeflag at the top of virepeatchange will do the job.

It'd be nice to quash the infinite loop, even if the result isn't
entirely identical to vi behavior.